Skip to content
J. Lynne & Co.J. Lynne & Co.

Advisory & Audits

The firm doesn't parachute in when it's broken. It has judgment before, during, and after.

One practice, organized as the full lifecycle — because that arc is the point. The same diagnostic judgment that decides readiness audits the build and remediates the aftermath.

Judgment, not headcount

What the firm sells is judgment — not bodies on a timeline.

The read on whether you're ready, what's actually wrong, and the call to make. That judgment runs the full lifecycle — before, during, and after.

Before01

Pre-implementation strategy

The most valuable thing the firm can tell a client is that they are not ready — and why. Readiness diagnosis ahead of selection or kickoff: governance, data, change capacity, and the honest question of whether to proceed at all.

During02

Audits, including SACS readiness

An independent, forensic read of a program in flight — where it actually stands against where it reports to stand, and what closes the gap before it becomes the post-mortem.

After03

Post-implementation remediation

When a go-live has landed badly, remediation framed as diagnosis and judgment — what broke, why, and the smallest set of moves that restores the program — not a deliverables list.

Representative work

Named engagements, not the menu.

The work below shows how the firm's judgment gets applied. Each engagement covers a specific type of situation and names the institutional contexts where it applies. If the situation you're carrying isn't named here, the right first move is a conversation.

Named engagement

Vendor Detox™ — rationalize the stack, on a clock.

A focused diagnostic that maps your vendor and contract stack, surfaces the redundancy, overspend, and risk hiding in it, and returns a clear consolidate-or-cut recommendation. The same assess-then-tell-you-the-truth muscle as the firm's audits, pointed at the vendor portfolio.

Verticals Higher education, financial services, mid-market companies, law firms, public-sector agencies, healthcare.

Audit practice · higher education

SACS accreditation-readiness, run against the reaffirmation clock.

Reaffirmation does not move. The visiting committee arrives on a date set years out, and the institution's technology and data evidence is either defensible by then or it is not. The cost of finding out late is measured in findings, monitoring reports, and reputational exposure.

The firm runs an independent readiness audit ahead of the cycle: the evidence assembled, the gaps surfaced while there is still time to close them, and the institution's narrative made defensible before the committee — not after.

Verticals Higher education, financial services, mid-market companies, law firms, public-sector agencies, healthcare.

Advisory practice

Vendor & System Selection — the right choice, run cleanly.

The major system decision — core banking, matter management, SIS, ERP, EHR — is the one most institutions run infrequently and least well. Requirements aren't fully surfaced. The RFP reflects vendor language rather than institutional need. Evaluation collapses into demos and gut feel. The firm runs the selection process the way it should be run: requirements built from the institution's actual work, an RFP that asks what matters, an evaluation that produces a defensible recommendation. Three entry points depending on where the client needs help — from requirements through contract, or joining the work already in flight.

Verticals Higher education, financial services, mid-market companies, law firms, public-sector agencies, healthcare.

Two handoffs

The right altitude for the need.

Down → CIO Advisra

Need the structured assessment, not the bespoke engagement?

The bespoke accreditation audit — the firm's judgment, high-touch — belongs to the firm. The productized six-pillar maturity assessment belongs to CIO Advisra. Same vertical, two altitudes. If you need the structured read, the firm routes you down to the program.

Up → Expert Witness

When a failure becomes contested.

The audits are where the firm's forensic judgment is built and proven — the same muscle that, when an implementation failure becomes a matter, testifies to why it failed. The audit work is the credibility bridge to the witness work.